Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates the necessity of critical and dialogical theorizing in family research, highlighting how examining assumptions improves empirical validity.
Theory performs vital descriptive, sensitizing, integrative, explanatory, and value functions in the generation of knowledge about families. Yet theory and research can also simultaneously misconceive, desensitize, misdirect, misinterpret, and devalue. Overcoming the degenerative potentialities of theory and research requires attention to critical theorizing, a joint process of (a) critically examining the explicit and implicit assumptions of theory and research and (b) using dialogical theoretical practices. I draw upon the work of John Stuart Mill to argue that critical and dialogical theorizing is a vital and necessary practice in the production of understandings of family phenomena that are more fully scientific and empirical. A brief examination of behavioral research on marital interaction illustrates the importance of critical theorizing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stan J. Knapp (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: