Why the study?
Does the inactive urinary kallikrein:creatinine ratio (IUK:Cr) improve the prediction of pre-eclampsia compared to the angiotensin sensitivity test (AST) in normotensive nulliparous women?
Does the inactive urinary kallikrein:creatinine ratio (IUK:Cr) improve the prediction of pre-eclampsia compared to the angiotensin sensitivity test (AST) in normotensive nulliparous women?
The IUK:Cr ratio is a better screening test for pre-eclampsia than the AST in normotensive nulliparous women, though neither test is a highly powerful predictor.
IUK:Cr may offer better pre-eclampsia screening sensitivity than AST in nulliparas; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between the inactive urinary kallikrein: creatinine ratio (IUK:Cr) and the angiotensin sensitivity test (AST) at 28 weeks of gestation and to assess each as a screening test for pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty-nine normotensive nulliparous women recruited from hospital antenatal clinics. SETTING: John Radcliffe Maternity Hospital, Oxford, and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London. INTERVENTIONS: A urine sample for IUK:Cr measurement was provided before performing the AST at 28 weeks of gestation. Those women who demonstrated increased sensitivity to angiotensin II were entered into a randomised placebo controlled trial of low dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia (CLASP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The development of pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: The IUK:Cr ratio was significantly lower in those women who showed increased sensitivity to angiotensin II (P < 0.0001 Student's t test). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting pre-eclampsia were, respectively, 22% and 85% for the AST and 67% and 75% for the IUK:Cr. Low-dose aspirin (60 mg) had no effect on the pregnancy outcome. CONCLUSION: There appears to be some relation between the IUK:Cr and AST tests in pregnancy. However, in this population, the IUK:Cr ratio was a better screening test for pre-eclampsia than the AST, but overall neither test was a powerful predictor for the syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyle et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: