Why the study?
Pulmonary thromboembolism remains an underdiagnosed fatal emergency condition, and the role of echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism remains incompletely defined.
Does echocardiography improve diagnosis and management in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Does echocardiography improve diagnosis and management in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
While not useful for low-risk acute pulmonary embolism, echocardiography provides valuable prognostic and diagnostic information in high-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Echocardiography should not guide diagnosis or management in low-risk acute PE; leaves open its role in higher-risk patients with RV dysfunction.
Pulmonary thromboembolism (TP) remains an underdiagnosed fatal disease at the emergency unit that suggests the need for alternative noninvasive approaches to rapid diagnosis. The role of echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism (EP) remains incompletely defined. Echocardiography cannot reliably diagnose acute EP and does not improve the prognosis of patients with low-risk acute PE, who lack other clinical characteristics of right ventricle dysfunction (VD). However, echocardiography and dopplerography of the venous system may produce additional information in high-risk patients and may help differentiate chronic VD dysfunction. Specific echocardiographic predictors of VD dysfunction have the potential to increase prognosis in patients at high risk of TP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuzor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: