Why the study?
Does emergency myocardial infarctectomy improve survival in massive myocardial infarction?
Does emergency myocardial infarctectomy improve survival in massive myocardial infarction?
Emergency myocardial infarctectomy demonstrated potential survival benefits in an experimental calf model of fatal infarction and showed encouraging results in a small clinical case series.
Emergency infarctectomy shows promise in experimental models but should not change practice; warrants prospective human trials.
Emergency myocardial infarctectomy has been studied experimentally and clinically. The clinical experience describes encouraging results in two of four consecutive patients. The criteria of patient selection are described, along with a suggestion that associated perforation of the ventricular septum, as documented in three of the patients, makes the operative procedure more difficult and the results less satisfactory. Experimental myocardial infarction was studied in two groups of calves with a mortality rate of 100%. In the first group emergency resuscitation by massage and bypass produced an initial resuscitation rate of 14% but a survival rate of only 11%. In the second control group of fatal infarction, resuscitation was attempted by 45 minutes of bypass, with improvement in the resuscitation rate to only 23% and proportionate improvement in the survival rate to 18%. Emergency infarctectomy dramatically increased the initial salvage rate to 100% and improved the survival rate to 41%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heimbecker et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: