Why the study?
Blood flow-restricted resistance training is safe and efficacious in healthy older adults, but its effects have not been established in cardiovascular disease.
Does blood flow-restricted resistance training combined with aerobic training improve hemodynamic and hemostatic responses in stable patients with coronary artery disease?
Does blood flow-restricted resistance training combined with aerobic training improve hemodynamic and hemostatic responses in stable patients with coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Blood flow-restricted resistance training combined with aerobic training is safe and improves systolic blood pressure in stable CAD patients, supporting its use as an additional exercise modality in cardiac rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Blood flow-restricted resistance training (BFR-RT) has been proven to be safe and efficacious in healthy older adults, but not in cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the acute and training induced effects of BFR-RT on hemostatic and hemodynamic responses in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Stable patients with CAD were randomized to 8 weeks of BFR-RT (30%-40% 1-repetition maximum unilateral knee extension) combined with aerobic training or aerobic training alone (control group). At baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks, blood samples were taken before and after BFR exercise, whereas hemodynamic parameters were monitored throughout the exercise. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (12 per group; mean age, 60 ± 2 years; mostly male [75%]) completed the study. The BFR-RT significantly improved systolic blood pressure (-10 mm Hg; P = .020) and tended to lower diastolic blood pressure (-2 mm Hg; P = .066). In contrast, no posttraining alterations were observed in N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic hormone, fibrinogen, and D-dimer values. During BFR exercise, all hemodynamic variables significantly increased after the first and second set, whereas blood pressure immediately lowered after the cuff was released in the third set. Last, significant interaction was only observed for repetitions × intensity (P < .001; partial η2 = 0.908) of diastolic blood pressure at higher exercise intensity (40% 1-repetition maximum). CONCLUSIONS: The BFR-RT was proven to be safe, with favorable hemodynamic and hemostatic responses in patients with CAD, and can be recommended as an additional exercise modality in cardiac rehabilitation.Trial Registration:ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03087292.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kambič et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: