Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spencer LM, Alison JA, McKeough ZJ: Six-minute walk test as an outcome measure: are two six-minute walk tests necessary immediately after pulmonary rehabilitation and at three-month follow-up? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:224–228. A 3-mo prospective, longitudinal, repeated-measures study was undertaken in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study aimed to determine whether there was a difference in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) when two 6-min walk tests were performed after pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 44) and at 3-mo follow-up (n = 40), and whether the results reflected the program outcomes. There was a significant increase in 6MWD between two 6-min walk tests before rehabilitation (P < 0.001), and at 3-mo follow-up (P < 0.001), but not immediately after rehabilitation (P = 0.1). In terms of program outcomes, there was an increase in 6MWD from before to after pulmonary rehabilitation (P < 0.001); however, the increase was greater if the better of two tests was reported. Six-minute walk tests performed twice before and after pulmonary rehabilitation programs and at 3-mo follow-up assessments ensure accuracy of measurement of the 6MWD and program outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spencer et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: