Why the study?
Does evaluation in an integrated syncope clinic achieve a high diagnostic yield in older patients with recurrent unexplained syncope?
Does evaluation in an integrated syncope clinic achieve a high diagnostic yield in older patients with recurrent unexplained syncope?
Evaluation of older patients with unexplained syncope in an integrated syncope clinic yields a high diagnostic rate (88%), predominantly of cardiovascular origin.
May support integrated clinics for evaluating recurrent syncope in older adults; leaves open whether this improves outcomes versus standard care.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the findings in the first year of an integrated syncope clinic for older patients and to review the published literature on "integrated" syncope clinics investigating older people. DESIGN: Review of syncope clinic database and Medline search for relevant literature. SETTING: Outpatient syncope clinics in two district hospitals in the same city. PARTICIPANTS: Secondary referrals from the in- and outpatient population with recurrent unexplained presyncopal and syncopal symptoms. RESULTS: The results of testing in 76 patients over the age of 60 years were available for analysis. A diagnosis was achieved in 67 (88%) of the patients with 76% of the diagnoses being cardiovascular in origin. The prevalence rates of neurocardiogenic syncope (32%) and carotid sinus syndrome (17%), however, differed from previously reported rates. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of presyncopal and syncopal events in an "integrated syncope clinic" achieves a high diagnostic yield in older subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Youde et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: