Why the study?
No antivirals are available for enterovirus A71, and capsid binders rapidly select for drug resistance, prompting exploration of whether dual-inhibitor combinations delay resistance.
Combining capsid binders with protease or polymerase inhibitors can delay in vitro resistance development in Enterovirus 71.
Combination may delay pirodavir resistance in vitro; leaves open clinical translation for EV-A71.
There are currently no antivirals available to treat infection with enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) or any other enterovirus. The extensively studied capsid binders select rapidly for drug-resistant variants. We here explore whether the combination of two direct-acting enterovirus inhibitors with a different mechanism of action may delay or prevent resistance development to the capsid binders. To that end, the in vitro dynamics of resistance development to the capsid binder pirodavir was studied either alone or in combination with (i) a viral 2C-targeting compound (SMSK_0213), (ii) a viral 3C-protease inhibitor (rupintrivir) or (iii) a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitor [7-deaza-2’ C -methyladenosine (7DMA)]. We demonstrate that combining pirodavir with either rupintrivir or the nucleoside analogue 7DMA delays the development of resistance to pirodavir and that no resistance to the protease or polymerase inhibitor develops. The combination of pirodavir with the 2C inhibitor results in a double-resistant virus population. The deep sequencing analysis of resistant populations revealed that even though resistant mutations are present in less than 30% of the population, this still provides the resistant phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanko et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: