Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Addition of zwitterionic surfactants such as dodecyldimethyl(3-sulfopropyl)ammonium hydroxide, hexadecyldimethyl(3-sulfopropyl)ammonium hydroxide, and coco (amidopropyl)hydroxyldimethylsulfobetaine (Rewoteric AM CAS U) to an electrophoretic buffer suppress the electroosmotic flow by 50-90%. Onset of suppression occurs at approximately the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant. CAS U effectively suppresses the electroosmotic flow over the pH range 3-12. Addition of 2 mM CAS U to the electrophoretic buffer prevents adsorption of cationic proteins lysozyme, α-chymotrypsinogen A, cytochrome c, and ribonuclease A. Migration time reproducibility for these proteins is ∼1% RSD within 1 day and 2-5% from day to day. Efficiencies in excess of 750 000 plates/m and recoveries of >80% were observed for protein injections from distilled water. Alternatively if 2 mM CAS U is added to samples, recoveries were quantitative, although efficiencies decreased to 325 000-600 000 plates/m. The natural electroosmotic flow of the capillaries is regenerated simply by rinsing with sodium hydroxide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeung et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: