Why the study?
It is unclear how athletes regulate their performance prior to and during exercise when deceptive methods are applied.
Does unaware clock manipulation influence pacing strategy and running performance in recreational athletes?
Does unaware clock manipulation influence pacing strategy and running performance in recreational athletes?
Unaware clock manipulation alters total distance and pacing strategy in the initial and final phases of exercise, but does not significantly change average speed, heart rate, or perceived exertion.
Time deception may alter pacing in recreational runners; leaves open effects in elites and any performance benefit.
It is unclear how athletes regulate their performance prior and during exercise when deceptive methods are applied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test if time manipulation can influence pacing strategy and running performance. Ten recreationally active subjects were informed they would complete four 60-min time trials only with time feedback. The first session was a familiarization trial (60-min), and in the following three sessions, the time feedback was modified: normal chronometer (NC—60 min.), 10% faster (Faster chronometer—FC—54 min.), and 10% slower (slower chronometer—SC—66 min.). Total distance was different between conditions, while average of total speed, Heart Rate, oxygen consumption, and Rate of Perceived Exertion were similar (p > 0.05). A slow start pacing strategy was adopted in all conditions and did not differ between conditions when averaged across the session; however, when analyzing the first and final 10 min of the session, differences were found between conditions. Finally, the observed time was an important determinant of the regulation of exercise intensity, because, although the pacing strategy adopted in all conditions was regulated according to previous exercise information, adjustments were made in the initial (NC) and final (FC) phases of the trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terra et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: