This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To compare postmortem changes in motor vs. non-motor regions of the cerebellum in essential tremor (ET) cases. Background: ET is a progressive neurological disease. Detailed postmortem studies have documented a variety of neuropathological changes in the ET cerebellum centered on the Purkinje cell (PC) and neighboring neuronal populations. To date, motor vs. non-motor regions of the cerebellum have not been compared in terms of the extent of these changes. Design/Methods: 15 ET case brains were harvested through the Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository. For each case, a formalin-fixed cerebellar parasagittal slice was processed to create tissue blocks from motor (anterior lobules IV-V) and non-motor (posterior lobules Crus I & II) regions. Paraffin sections (7-μm) were stained with Luxol fast blue-Hematoxylin and Eosin and Bielschowsky stains. Each of the following neuropathological changes was quantified: PC linear density, PC heterotopias, torpedoes, PC dendritic swellings, and extent of basket cell plexus surrounding the PC soma (“basket rating”). Results: Comparing motor vs. non-motor regions, there were no differences in PC linear density = 4.69 ± 1.05 vs. 4.42 ± 0.82 (p = 0.45), number of dendritic swellings = 1.7 ± 2.8 vs. 2.5 ± 4.0 (p = 0.71), or basket rating = 20% low, 40% intermediate, 40% high vs. 40% low, 40% intermediate, and 20% high (p = 0.51). PC heterotopias were fewer in the motor cerebellum = 26.8 ± 24.7 vs. 72.1 ± 59.2 (p = 0.01); torpedoes were greater in the motor cerebellum = 63.3 ± 48.8 vs. 27.3 ± 21.9 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: These data preliminarily suggest that there may be neuropathological differences between motor and non-motor regions of the cerebellum in ET cases. Further studies with larger samples are needed to further elaborate these results. Study Supported by: NIH R01 NS088257. Disclosure: Dr. Tate has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kelly has nothing to disclose. Dr. Faust has nothing to disclose. Dr. Louis has nothing to disclose.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tate et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: