Why the study?
Does 14 consecutive days of moderate intensity cycling affect cardiac function and biomarkers in elderly male athletes?
Does 14 consecutive days of moderate intensity cycling affect cardiac function and biomarkers in elderly male athletes?
Prolonged moderate-intensity cycling in elderly men transiently increases cardiac biomarkers without altering cardiac function, while favorably reducing lipids and diastolic blood pressure, though it carries a risk of severe hyponatremia.
Transient biomarker rises without resting dysfunction after 14-day moderate cycling; leaves open long-term cardiac effects in elderly athletes.
OBJECTIVES: Physiological effects of exercise on trained and untrained individuals have been studied extensively. Typically, young or middle-aged individuals are examined before and after short periods of vigorous exertion. METHODS: ) with focus on cardiac function and biomarkers following 14 consecutive days of moderate intensity exercise. Cardiac dimensions, function, biomarkers, and other measures of cardiovascular health were examined at baseline and 2 and 28 h after the last day of cycling a total of 2706 km. RESULTS: max was significantly lower at the 28 h time point than at baseline (p < 0.02). Plasma concentrations of total- (p < 0.01) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (p < 0.01) were markedly lower after exercise. Systolic blood pressure was unchanged, but diastolic pressure was significantly lower after exercise than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that repeated moderate intensity exercise in elderly men was associated with a transient increase in cardiac biomarkers while cardiac function remained unaltered. A favorable reduction in blood lipids and diastolic blood pressure were seen for >28 h after the end of activity. An unexplained symptomless severe plasma hyponatremia developed in 3 of 6 subjects 28 h after the end of activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morville et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: