Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the increasing resistance to commonly used antimalarial drugs, different untested 'local' treatment regimens for malaria will arise. We compared commonly used treatment regimens for children in Guinea-Bissau. Symptomatic children with Plasmodium falciparum mono-infection were allocated at random to one of 4 treatments: 15 mg/kg quinine twice a day for 3 d (group 1); 10 mg/kg quinine twice a day for 3 d followed by a total dose of 25 mg chloroquine base given over 3 d (group 2); a total dose of 50 mg/kg chloroquine base given in 2 daily doses for 3 d (group 3), or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (group 4). On day 28 more children from group 1 (33%; relative risk [RR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.7) and group 2 (26%; RR = 2.1, CI 1.0-4.3) had had parasitaemia than in group 4 (12%), whereas no significant difference was found between group 3 (17%; RR = 1.3, CI 0.6-2.2) and group 4. No severe adverse reaction was observed in any of the groups. Chloroquine is still effective in Guinea-Bissau at an increased dose of 50 mg/kg, which appears safe when given orally in 2 daily doses for 3 d. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine could serve as an efficient, cheap and easy to administer second-line drug, leaving quinine to be used for third-line treatment. Quinine should not be used in short courses, nor does the combination of quinine and chloroquine have any advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kofoed et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: