Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CO 2 geo-sequestration and compressed air energy storage in depleted coal seam gas reservoirs are promising techniques for mitigating the greenhouse effect and combating climate change. However, gas adsorption-induced swelling in coal matrices poses challenges to gas injectivity by reducing both coal absolute permeability and relative permeability. While the sorption-induced impact on absolute permeability has been extensively studied, its impact on relative permeability remains little explored. To address this gap, a suite of two-phase flow experiments was conducted with both absorbing and non-absorbing gases. A series of relative permeability curves for helium-water, nitrogen-water, and CO 2 -water systems were obtained. The results show lower relative permeability for absorbing gas-water systems (nitrogen and CO 2 ) compared to non-absorbing gas (helium) due to the sorption-induced swelling impact. Specifically, the relative permeability of helium-water systems is more than two times higher than that of nitrogen-water systems, followed by CO 2 -water injection due to differences in adsorption capacity. Finally, quantitative correlations for estimating the relative permeability of nitrogen-water and CO 2 -water systems were obtained, based on four newly introduced coefficients. These coefficients enable direct estimation of absorbing gas-water two-phase flow behavior (e.g., CO 2 sequestration and compressed air storage) in coal. The applicability of these coefficients was further validated using data from other studies, providing useful insights for assessing the injectivity of CO 2 geo-sequestration and underground compressed air energy storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: