In addition to permanent physical and cognitive deficits, many individuals with closed head injury (CHI) experience poor psychosocial outcomes, such as interpersonal and family conflict, emotional distress, and behavioural disturbances. Although very little is known about the characteristics that predispose these individuals to psychosocial disruption following CHI, many researchers have suggested that neurological factors, such as the locus of the lesion, the severity of the injury or the level of cognitive impairment, offer the most parsimonious explanation. However, a number of studies have indicated that neurological factors are unable to account adequately for individual variation in psychosocial outcom e, and that there m ight be a significant role for non-neurological factors. Despite this evidence, there has been a lack of research that has system atically investigated the non-neurological determ inants of psychosocial adjustm ent am ong individuals w ith CHI. The present paper describes a m odel derived from the Lazarus and Folkman (1984) cognitive-phenomenological theory of stress and adjustment, which is proposed to be a heuristically useful framework for the exam ination of the non-neurological variables that might influence psychosocial w ell-being follow ing CHI. It is proposed that, with adequate research, this model will have utility for the identification of “at risk”; individuals and will provide a focus for rehabilitative eff orts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth Kendall (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: