The objective of this study was to investigate how thinning practice influences the preferences of adult Danes for forest recreation in young stands of even-aged oak. The study was based on five pairs of colour photographs from each of five recently thinned plots in a 13-year old experiment. The plots included 7000 stems ha−1 (unthinned), 5300 ha−1 (traditional thinning), 1000 ha−1, 300 ha−1 and 100 ha−1. All cut trees were left on the ground. The study was carried out as a national survey based on postal questionnaires (n=243, response 73%). Interviewees ranked the photographs according to the criterion: “Which forest environment do you prefer as a visitor?” Visitor accessibility was interpreted as being more important than stand density per se. Thinning slash was pointed out as a major factor for the impression of accessibility. Low to mid-range densities (300–5300 ha−1) were preferred over very dense (7000 ha−1) or very open (100 ha−1) stands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: