Why the study?
Neural responses differ following concentric and eccentric contractions, suggesting differences in motor control, but brain activation patterns during these contractions at varying intensities required investigation.
Does contraction type (concentric vs eccentric) or intensity affect brain activation in the primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices in young adults?
Does contraction type (concentric vs eccentric) or intensity affect brain activation in the primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices in young adults?
High-intensity muscle contractions elicit greater brain activation in the primary motor cortex and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices compared to low-intensity contractions, regardless of whether the contraction is concentric or eccentric.
No ECC-CON differences in M1/DLPFC activation; leaves open intensity-driven central adaptations for neurorehabilitation.
Studies have shown that neural responses following concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) muscle contractions are different, which suggests differences in motor control associated with CON and ECC contractions. This study aims to determine brain activation of the left primary motor cortex (M1) and left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFCs) during ECC and CON of the right bicep brachii (BB) muscle at low‐ and high‐contraction intensities. Eighteen young adults (13M/5F, 21–35 years) were recruited to participate in one familiarization and two testing sessions in a randomized crossover design. During each testing session, participants performed either ECC or CON contractions of the BB (3 sets × 8 reps) at low‐ (25% of maximum ECC/CON, 45°/s) and high‐intensity (75% of maximum ECC/CON, 45°/s) on an isokinetic dynamometer. Eleven‐channel functional near‐infrared spectroscopy was used to measure changes in oxyhemoglobin (O 2 Hb) from the left M1, and left and right DLPFC during ECC and CON contractions. Maximum torque for ECC was higher than CON (43.3 ± 14.1 vs. 46.2 ± 15.7 N m, p = 0.025); however, no differences in O 2 Hb were observed between contraction types at low or high intensities in measured brain regions. High‐intensity ECC and CON contractions resulted in greater increases in O 2 Hb of M1 and bilateral DLPFC compared to low‐intensity ECC and CON contractions ( p = 0.014). Our findings suggest no differences in O 2 Hb responses between contraction types at high and low intensities. High‐contraction intensities resulted in greater brain activation of the M1 and bilateral DLPFC, which may have implications for neurorehabilitation to increase central adaptations from exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teo et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: