// Il Minn 1 , Soo Min Koo 1 , Hye Soo Lee 1 , Mary Brummet 1 , Steven P. Rowe 1 , Michael A. Gorin 2 , Polina Sysa-Shah 1 , William D. Lewis 1 , Hye-Hyun Ahn 1 , Yuchuan Wang 1 , Sangeeta Ray Banerjee 1 , Ronnie C. Mease 1 , Sridhar Nimmagadda 1 , Mohamad E. Allaf 2 , Martin G. Pomper 1 , Xing Yang 1 1 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 2 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Correspondence to: Martin G. Pomper, email: mpomper@jhmi.edu Xing Yang, email: xyang45@jhmi.edu Keywords: carbonic anhydrase IX, positron emission tomography, molecular imaging, renal cell carcinoma, copper-64 Received: February 25, 2016 Accepted: June 09, 2016 Published: July 14, 2016 ABSTRACT Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a cell surface enzyme that is over-expressed in approximately 95% of cases of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common renal cancer. We synthesized and performed in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a dual-motif ligand, [ 64 Cu]XYIMSR-06, for imaging CAIX expression on ccRCC tumors using positron emission tomography (PET). [ 64 Cu]XYIMSR-06 was generated in yields of 51.0 ± 4.5% (n=5) and specific activities of 4.1 – 8.9 GBq/μmol (110-240 Ci/mmol). Tumor was visualized on PET images by 1 h post-injection with high tumor-to-background levels (>100 tumor-to-blood and -muscle) achieved within 24 h. Biodistribution studies demonstrated a maximum tumor uptake of 19.3% injected dose per gram of radioactivity at 4 h. Tumor-to-blood, -muscle and -kidney ratios were 129.6 ± 18.8, 84.3 ± 21.0 and 2.1 ± 0.3, respectively, at 8 h post-injection. At 24 h a tumor-to-kidney ratio of 7.1 ± 2.5 was achieved. These results indicate pharmacokinetics superior to those of previously reported imaging agents binding to CAIX. [ 64 Cu]XYIMSR-06 is a new low-molecular-weight PET ligand targeting CAIX, which can image localized and metastatic ccRCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minn et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: