The arguments that are given in the original trialogue in favor of a quadruply bonded C 2 , in which the bond is claimed to be stronger than that in HCCH, are judged invalid by the authors of this Correspondence. They also disagree with some statements about the stability of molecules and the virtue of chemical research beyond synthetic chemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frenking et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: