Why the study?
How do registered nurses view and justify routine post anaesthetic observations?
How do registered nurses view and justify routine post anaesthetic observations?
Post-operative nursing observations appear to be driven by procedure and tradition rather than individualized patient assessment.
Protocol-driven RPAOs may overlook individualized assessment; leaves open whether tailored observations improve safety.
Fifty registered nurses were interviewed to determine how nurses view routine post anaesthetic observations (RPAOs). A structured interview established whether nurses routinely carry out post anaesthetic observations and if they believe that routine observations are part of ward procedure or hospital policy. Nurses' beliefs about the necessity for performing these observations and the rationales they use to justify them were also explored. The results show that all the nurses sampled interpreted RPAOs to mean half hourly vital sign measurements for four hours, and believed that the regimen was prescribed by ward or hospital policy. Many believed that this frequency was necessary to detect complications of surgery or anaesthesia. A small number of nurses felt obliged to comply with perceived hospital policy despite an assessment that it was unnecessary. Procedure-driven assessment and tradition rather than individualized patient assessment appear to be directing post operative nursing actions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Botti et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: