Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performance of the Pedi-BacT system, the BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika Corp., Durham, N.C.) pediatric blood culture bottle, was compared with that of a conventional 20-ml supplemented peptone broth tube (Becton-Dickinson Corp., Cockeysville, Md.) (BD system) in matched aerobic cultures. The tubes of the BD system were visually examined daily for 7 days and were subcultured during the first 24 h of incubation. Pedi-BacT cultures were mechanically agitated and continuously monitored for growth by the instrument. Of the 6,628 compliant pairs, 331 (5.0%) were positive in both systems, 220 (3.3%) were positive in the Pedi-BacT system only, and 170 (2.6%) were positive in the BD system only. One (0.02%) false-negative culture and 15 (0.2%) false-positive cultures occurred with the Pedi-BacT system while 20 (0.3%) false-negative cultures and 35 (0.5%) false-positive cultures occurred with the BD system. Of 288 clinically significant organisms detected in matched pairs from which a single isolate was recovered, 176 (61%) were recovered from both systems, 83 (29%) were recovered from the Pedi-BacT system only (P < 0.0001), and 29 (10%) were recovered from the BD system only. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.01), miscellaneous nonfermenters (P < 0.05), and Candida spp. (P < 0.01) were isolated more frequently in the Pedi-BacT system than in the BD system. No significant difference in recovery of other organisms was found between the systems. The average time to detection for the Pedi-BacT system ranged from 11.5 h for streptococci to 29.7 h for enterococci, while that for the BD system ranged from 20.3 h for streptococci to 66.4 h for some nonfermenters. The BacT/Alert system is a reliable, labor-saving alternative to conventional blood culture methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krisher et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: