Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical findings from 76 patients (median age 67 years) with gram-negative bacteremia were analysed and related to the sensitivity of the blood isolates to the bactericidal activity of normal human serum. 28 strains (37%) were resistant, an equal number intermediately sensitive and 20 markedly sensitive (26%). No correlation was found between serum sensitivity and origin of the bacteremia, presence of fever or blood granulocyte count. The frequency of shock in immunocompromised patients with serum-resistant strains was 60% (6/10); in those with intermediately or markedly sensitive strains it was 44% (8/18). In the non-immunocompromised patients with resistant strains the frequency of shock was 33 (6/18) versus 10% (3/30) in those without such strains. Thus the risk of developing shock with gram-negative bacteremia seems to depend on both parasite and host factors, although in this study only the latter were statistically significant. We conclude that serum-sensitive strains can invade the blood stream in spite of the serum bactericidal activity and cause severe disease in some patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elgefors et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: