Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates an 8.3% failure rate following structured partial foot amputation in diabetics, highlighting its potential to prevent higher-level amputations.
Aim: This study was conducted to test a protocol for the management of diabetics scheduled for partial foot amputation in a trial to improve the outcome. Methods: 60 patients underwent partial foot amputation with planned osseous resection and soft tissue coverage followed by postoperative pressure offloading between January 2002 and January 2006. Results: Amputations performed were ray in (51.6%), trans-metatarsal in (43.3%), Lisfranc’s in (3.3%), and Chopart’s in (1.7%). Coverage was done by planter flaps in (70%), combined flaps in (13.3%), skin grafts in (5%), and second intention in (11.7%). Complications were failure in (8.3%), adjacent limited arthritis or osteomyelitis in (11.7%), deformities in (15%), and instability in (11.7%). Further interventions were delayed primary closure in (6.7%), skin grafts in (5%), further partial foot amputation in (11.7%), and below knee amputation in (8.3%). The outcome was 53 partial foot amputees (88.3%) able to use their feet for one year without recurrent ulceration. Conclusion: The marked reduction in failure rate from (52%) in literature to (8.3%) with such protocol is encouraging to pay more interest in partial foot amputations as an alternative to higher ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imam et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: