Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether self-reported computer familiarity is related to performance on computerized neurocognitive testing. Participants were 130 healthy adults who self-reported whether their computer use was “some” (n = 65) or “frequent” (n = 65). The two groups were individually matched on age, education, sex, and race. All completed the CNS Vital Signs (Gualtieri & Johnson, 2006b Gualtieri, C. T. and Johnson, L. G. 2006b. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21: 623–643. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) computerized neurocognitive battery. There were significant differences on 6 of the 23 scores, including scores derived from the Symbol–Digit Coding Test, Stroop Test, and the Shifting Attention Test. The two groups were also significantly different on the Psychomotor Speed (Cohen's d = 0.37), Reaction Time (d = 0.68), Complex Attention (d = 0.40), and Cognitive Flexibility (d = 0.64) domain scores. People with “frequent” computer use performed better than people with “some” computer use on some tests requiring rapid visual scanning and keyboard work.