Both electrochemical and chemical doping of the n-type regioregular polymer poly{[ N, N ′-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-naphthalene-1,4,5,8-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl]- alt -5,5′-(2,2′-bithiophene)} (P(NDI2OD-T 2 )) and its regioirregular counterparts are presented. Electrochemical doping clearly shows that a 2-fold reduction with maximum conductivity in the radical-anion state is possible with the polymers. Chemical doping with the state-of-the-art high-performance dopants 4-(2,3-dihydro-1,3-dimethyl-1 H -benzimidazol-2-yl)- N, N -dimethylbenzeneamine (N-DMBI) and tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) gives conductivity values between 10 –4 and 10 –3 S cm –1 for as-cast films with clear involvement of the radical-anion species. Anisotropic conductivities of vapor-doped blade-coated films give up to 6 times higher values along the polymer chain direction compared with the perpendicular direction, both in face-on and edge-on oriented chains in the bulk of the films. The polymorph concomitantly changes from a mixed stacking of naphthalenediimide and bithiophene units (form II) to a segregated stacking mode (form I), indicating a strong effect of the dopant on the overall film structure. Maximum achievable conductivity along the chain is 8 × 10 –3 S cm –1 . Our study underlines that regardless of regioisomerism and film preparation, higher maximum conductivity seems not to be achievable with P(NDI2OD-T 2 ), at least with the herein used chemical dopants. Reasons might include the following: (1) strong localization of charges on the NDI units and (2) too low reduction potentials of the dopants, both evidenced by electrochemistry; (3) another factor is the high volatility of TDAE, which is elucidated by transmission electron microscopy, electron diffraction experiments, and spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: