The PING Project is a pilot project of the German Federal and the State Commission for Educational Planning which supports teacher, in-service trainer, and researcher co-operation to establish a practice of integrated science education. Together the members of PING are developing a conceptual framework, teaching material for integrated science education, and a structure of co-operation. To ensure a reflexive development PING uses research that informs its members about the effects and conditions of development. Within this process, reflective practice is an essential structural element. Using findings from a questionnaire and related in-depth interviews with five teachers this study asks: How can this reflective practice be structured? What types of instruments are useful for inducing reflection? and How reflection affects the understanding and application of PING?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Reinhold (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: