Comparative biomechanical study reveals a U-shaped metabolic power–speed curve in bumblebees, indicating tethered flight preserves power trajectories despite reduced energy expenditure.
Many insect species are reluctant to fly freely in wind tunnels, limiting direct free-flight energetics measurements to just two species. More commonly tethered-flight energetics have been investigated, though the effects of tethering on metabolic rate are unclear. Here, we report mass-specific gross metabolic rate (assessed as the rate of carbon dioxide production; V ˙ CO 2 ∗ ) across a speed range (0–4.1 m s −1 ) in bumblebee ( Bombus terrestris ) workers during tethered and free flight in a closed-circuit wind tunnel. V ˙ CO 2 ∗ followed a U-shaped relationship with airspeed during both free ( p = 0.009) and tethered flight ( p < 0.001). Bees were anaesthetized with isoflurane during tethering, which had no subsequent effect on their metabolic rate ( p > 0.05), avoiding issues reported during immobilization with CO 2 or cold exposure. Tethered V ˙ CO 2 ∗ was 45% lower than during free flight ( p < 0.001), but the minimum power speed and the trajectory of the metabolic power–speed relationship ( p > 0.8) were similar. Overall flight efficiency ranged from 7.3 to 14.7% and did not vary with airspeed. These findings confirm a U-shaped metabolic power–speed relationship in insects, and suggest that tethered flight may approximate free-flight energetics. However, a shift in the maximum range speed to slower speeds during tethered flight warrants caution against using this variable to predict behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senior et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: