Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Germ-cell tumours (GCTs) are collectively the most common cancer type in men aged 15–40 years, and they are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Platinum-based chemotherapy has dramatically improved the outcome for patients with metastatic disease since the first patient was treated at Indiana University in 1974 ( Einhorn & Donohue, 1977 ); however, despite the high cure rate of 70–80%, ∼ 20–30% of patients with metastatic disease will relapse after first-line chemotherapy ( Albany et al, 2017a ). The International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classifies patients with metastatic GCT into good, intermediate, and poor risk groups based on three clinical prognostic criteria: primary tumour site, metastatic sites, and the amplitude of serum tumour marker levels ( IGCCCG, 1997 ). However, these IGCCCG prognostic criteria are merely a reflection of the volume of disease rather than the pathology. Currently, no biological prognostic serum biomarker exists for this disease beyond the serum tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and these two markers do not predict who will relapse after chemotherapy. For example, patients with elevated AFP (>10 000 ng/ml) or hCG (>50 000 IU/L) are classified as poor-risk, with a 50% chance of cure following four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and platinum (BEP) chemotherapy; however, we cannot predict whether a particular patient will respond to this chemotherapy. Thus, a biologically driven biomarker that reflects the pathogenesis is highly needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costantine Albany (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: