Why the study?
Can wearable physiological status monitoring systems accurately track heat strain in soldiers during CBRN training?
Can wearable physiological status monitoring systems accurately track heat strain in soldiers during CBRN training?
Wearable physiological monitoring systems can effectively track real-time heat strain in soldiers wearing heavy protective equipment, potentially improving safety and performance.
May support PSI monitoring for heat strain in CBRN gear; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before practice change.
Heat strain was monitored in real-time in soldiers performing chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) training. Wearable physiological status monitoring (PSM) systems (EQ-02; Hidalgo, Ltd, Swavesey, Cambridge, UK) were evaluated by nine soldiers from a Civil Support Team – Weapons of Mass Destruction (CST-WMD) team (age, 27.3±4.9 (SD) y; wt, 84.5±15.1 kg; ht, 178.1±10.1 cm). Seven of these soldiers wore the PSM system during CBRN training and provided subjective feedback regarding the systems utility; two soldiers observed the training exercise and commented on the utility of the PSM system. During CBRN training, participants marched ~1600 m in 45 min while wearing Level A CBRN personal protective equipment (PPE). A 0-to-10 Physiological Strain Index, i.e., a 0-to-10 index of thermal-work strain, was calculated from estimated core temperature and measured heart rate. Individual PSI levels varied, with three individuals at a PSI > 8 (high thermal-work strain) and four individuals at a PSI < 8 (moderate strain). Real-time PSI levels corresponded to the subjective feelings of thermal strain reported by the test volunteers. In addition, the CST-WMD soldiers reported that real-time PSI information could be used to improve work performance and decrease the likelihood of experiencing heat illness during CBRN missions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tharion et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: