// Wen Li 1, 2, * , Guangzhi Ma 2, 3, * , Qiang Wu 2, * , Yunfu Deng 2 , Ya Liu 1 and Jing Wang 1 1 Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China 2 Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China 3 Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Jing Wang, email: wangj889@163.com Keywords: lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), lung cancer, prognosis, meta-analysis Received: July 08, 2017 Accepted: August 04, 2017 Published: August 28, 2017 ABSTRACT Purpose: Numerous studies have reported the prognostic significance of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in malignancies, but its prognostic value among lung cancer remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the prognostic significance of LMR in lung cancer patients. Results: Eight studies including 3954 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated that low LMR was significantly associated with poorer progression-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.431, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.294–1.582, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.651, 95% CI: 1.306–2.086, p < 0.001), compared with high LMR. Similar results were observed in subgroups regardless of treatment, LMR cut-off value, or districts. However, no significant correlation between the LMR and OS was observed in the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) subgroup (HR = 1.262, 95% CI: 0.864–1.841, p = 0.229). Materials and Methods: Identified literatures were extracted and retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases; All eligible studies focused on the association between LMR and the prognosis of lung cancer. Conclusions: Low LMR is associated with poor outcomes among lung cancer patients. Further studies are needed to discuss the correlation between LMR and lung cancer prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: