Why the study?
Does the choice of anticoagulation regimen (warfarin, heparin, or sequential therapy) improve pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with mechanical cardiac valves?
Does the choice of anticoagulation regimen (warfarin, heparin, or sequential therapy) improve pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with mechanical cardiac valves?
In pregnant women with mechanical valves, the probability of successful delivery is low, and no single anticoagulation protocol demonstrated superiority in improving outcomes.
Live birth rates remain low (~56%) across regimens; leaves open optimal anticoagulation strategy in mechanical valve pregnancies.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the risk and outcome of anticoagulation in pregnant women who had a mechanical valve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was undertaken for 41 pregnancies (27 women, 33.1 +/- 4.7 years old) from January 1990 to December 2005. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group I (n = 5) took warfarin throughout the pregnancy, group II (n = 18) took heparin throughout the pregnancy, and group III (n = 18) took heparin in the 1st trimester and warfarin from a gestational age of 12 to 20 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-three pregnancies (56.1%) resulted in live births, 11 (26.8%) in stillbirths, and 8 (19.5%) in spontaneous abortions (SA). In group I, there were 2 live births (40.0%), 2 stillbirths (40.0%), and 1 SA (20.0%); in group II, there were 10 live births (55.6%), 1 stillbirth (5.6%), and 7 SA (38.9%); and in group III, there were 10 live births (55.6%), 8 stillbirths (44.4%), and no SA. No significant difference was observed between the 3 groups in terms of successful delivery rates (P = .826). CONCLUSION: The probability of successful delivery was low. No single reliable anticoagulation protocol in pregnant patients with mechanical valves emerged from the collated data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: