Why the study?
Do ARBs improve safety regarding cough and angioedema compared to ACE inhibitors?
Do ARBs improve safety regarding cough and angioedema compared to ACE inhibitors?
The authors advocate for an 'ARBs only' prescribing mentality over ACE inhibitors to reduce the risk of cough and angioedema, challenging historical clinical inertia.
Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have comparable efficacy, but ARBs have a preferential safety profile with particular regard to cough and angioedema. Although guidelines have historically advocated for ACE inhibitor use before ARBs simply because of earlier market entry, data accumulation, and generic availability, updated verbiage advises an "ACE inhibitor or ARB" recommendation, as opposed to the classic "ACE inhibitor then ARB" approach. Despite these updates, clinical inertia in favor of ACE inhibitor use before ARBs overwhelmingly remains. Prescribers and educators should consider an "ARBs only" mentality, especially in high angioedema-risk groups such as black patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lam et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: