Why the study?
Loneliness predicts negative health outcomes, but whether it increases the risk for metabolic syndrome remained unknown.
Does higher loneliness increase the risk of incident metabolic syndrome in a general population cohort?
Does higher loneliness increase the risk of incident metabolic syndrome in a general population cohort?
Higher levels of loneliness are associated with an increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome over 10 years, an effect that appears to be mediated by depressive symptoms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Loneliness was associated with higher MetS risk; hypothesis-generating for social interventions, should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) includes hyperglycaemia, hypertension, central adiposity, elevated triglyceride levels and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. All factors are identified as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality. This longitudinal study examined whether loneliness, which has been shown to predict a range of negative health outcomes, increases the risk for MetS. METHODS: We used data from 'the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study' (HUNT) which is a large longitudinal health study based on a Mid-Norway county population (n=26 990). Self-reports, physical examinations and blood samples were analysed to evaluate the associations between loneliness and incidents of MetS after 10 years (follow-up survey conducted during 2006-2008). We also investigated the role of depression as a potential mediating factor. RESULTS: Individuals who reported higher levels of loneliness had a higher odds for MetS (adjusted OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.16); p=0.007). This effect was mediated through depression. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that loneliness may be an important factor that increases the risk for MetS. The effect of loneliness on MetS is mediated through depressive symptoms. Reducing loneliness may help prevent the incidence of MetS and related diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henriksen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: