Background Falls and fall-related injuries are a problem for many adults with intellectual disability. Most previous studies have collected falls data retrospectively, using organisational incident reports. We developed tools to specifically collect fall-related data and potential fall risk data. This paper reports on the development of these tools and the fall-related data collected in 3 prospective studies.Method Consultations with 33 stakeholders representing 29 organisations and 5 focus group discussions were used to develop 2 tools for gathering information. Studies in 3 cities applied the tools to explore their acceptability, utility, and cultural appropriateness.Results Two simple tick box forms were developed; both were easy and quick to complete. In the studies, 135 individuals participated (70 males, 65 females, aged 45 [SD = 11] years), of whom 27% experienced a fall; 39% of these resulted in an injury. Injuries were mostly bruises (30%) and grazes (28%), particularly to the facial area (42%). The 6-month period prevalence of falls was 0.76%. Most falls occurred indoors and during the daytime. Individuals appeared more likely to experience a fall if they had had previous falls and/or fractures, epilepsy, orthopaedic-related conditions, and problems with gait and balance.Conclusion A robust process ensured the acceptability, utility, face and content validity, and cultural safety of our data collection tools. Falling is a serious problem for many people with intellectual disability, but the reasons for falling appear multifaceted and complex, complicating the development of fall prevention programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pal et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: