Key result
Nonrigid autofocus motion correction improves coronary vessel sharpness across ~93% of segments versus rigid-body correction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To implement a nonrigid autofocus motion correction technique to improve respiratory motion correction of free-breathing whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography acquisitions using an image-navigated 3D cones sequence. METHODS: 2D image navigators acquired every heartbeat are used to measure superior-inferior, anterior-posterior, and right-left translation of the heart during a free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography scan using a 3D cones readout trajectory. Various tidal respiratory motion patterns are modeled by independently scaling the three measured displacement trajectories. These scaled motion trajectories are used for 3D translational compensation of the acquired data, and a bank of motion-compensated images is reconstructed. From this bank, a gradient entropy focusing metric is used to generate a nonrigid motion-corrected image on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The performance of the autofocus motion correction technique is compared with rigid-body translational correction and no correction in phantom, volunteer, and patient studies. RESULTS: Nonrigid autofocus motion correction yields improved image quality compared to rigid-body-corrected images and uncorrected images. Quantitative vessel sharpness measurements indicate superiority of the proposed technique in 14 out of 15 coronary segments from three patient and two volunteer studies. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique corrects nonrigid motion artifacts in free-breathing 3D cones acquisitions, improving image quality compared to rigid-body motion correction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ingle et al. (2013) studied Free-breathing whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (n=5). Nonrigid autofocus motion correction technique vs. Rigid-body translational correction and no correction was evaluated on Quantitative vessel sharpness and image quality across coronary segments. Nonrigid autofocus motion correction showed superior quantitative vessel sharpness in 14 of 15 (93.3%) coronary segments compared to rigid-body and no correction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: