Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Instrument calibration, required for any accurate quantitative calculation, is a trivial process when performed correctly, but is also full of easily overlooked stumbling blocks. To minimize the risk of error associated with improper calibrations, national and international guidance dictates a minimum number of calibrators and the threshold at which a measurement becomes an outlier. Evidence from industry practice, which conflicts with regulatory guidance, suggests that most groups are focused on remapping their detector with each run. We present a post facto explanation for the calibrator minimum and provide recommendations for curve building, which include improved outlier detection for high-volume mass spectrometry laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zabell et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: