The steady-state current-voltage performance and load cycle durability of polymer electrolyte fuel cells using Pt catalysts supported on Sn 0.96 Nb 0.04 O 2-δ (Pt/Nb-SnO 2 ) cathode catalyst layers (CLs), without any carbon additive, were evaluated with various ionomer contents. The apparent mass activity at 0.80 V (MA app @0.80 V) of the cell using Pt/Nb-SnO 2 CL improved with decreasing volume ratio of the Nafion ionomer to the support (I/S). At I/S = 0.12, surprisingly, the MA app @0.80 V of the cell using Pt/Nb-SnO 2 CL approached 2 times higher than that using a commercial Pt catalyst supported on GCB (Pt/GCB) CL with the optimized I/S ratio. The current density at 0.60 V of the cell using Pt/Nb-SnO 2 (I/S = 0.12) CL also reached the same value of the cell using Pt/GCB CL. The electrochemically active surface area and MA app @0.80 V of Pt/Nb-SnO 2 CLs during the load cycle durability test maintained higher values than those of Pt/GCB throughout the test, indicating that the Pt/Nb-SnO 2 CL had higher durability than the Pt/GCB CL. Evaluation by means of low acceleration voltage transmission electron microscopy proved that the Nafion ionomer covered the hydrophilic surface of the Pt/Nb-SnO 2 uniformly, whereas the ionomer did not do so on the hydrophobic surface of the Pt/GCB. The thin, uniform coverage of the Nafion ionomer, which was thus easily obtained on the Pt/Nb-SnO 2 surface, was able to lower the overpotential originating from the oxygen diffusion resistance in the Nafion ionomer, thus improving the cell performance while maintaining the high load cycle durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakinuma et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: