Why the study?
What are the characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring across different types of angina pectoris?
What are the characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring across different types of angina pectoris?
Ambulatory ECG monitoring reveals that spontaneous ischemic attacks occur at lower heart rates than exercise-induced ischemia across all angina types, suggesting a role for increased coronary vascular tone.
May implicate vasomotor mechanisms in spontaneous angina; hypothesis-generating for ambulatory ECG use and should not yet change practice.
The purpose of the present study was to clarify the characteristics of myocardial ischemic attacks in patients with exertional angina (EA, 56 cases), exertional and rest angina (ERA, 28 cases), rest angina (RA, 4 cases), and variant angina (VA, 39 cases). The Holter electrocardiographic findings were compared among the four types of angina pectoris. The frequency of symptomatic ischemic attacks in descending order was 46.0% in EA, 29.0% in ERA, 28.1% in RA, and 21.6% in VA, while the frequency of asymptomatic ischemic attacks was in the reverse order. The maximal heart rates during symptomatic ischemic attacks were in descending order, EA, ERA, RA, and VA. The maximal heart rate during ischemic attacks was significantly lower in patients with spontaneous angina than in those with exercise-induced ischemia for all types of angina (p less than 0.05, respectively). Further, the difference in maximal heart rate during ischemic attacks between the ambulatory electrocardiogram and exercise test was greater in patients with RA and VA than in those with EA. Therefore, this suggests that increased coronary vascular tone is a cause of spontaneous ischemic attacks in each type of angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishida et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Japanese Heart Journal