Why the study?
As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote blood pressure assessment has been proposed to improve pediatric management, but the reliability of at-home monitoring in children aged 3–17 needed investigation.
Does at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring provide reliable blood pressure classification compared to clinic measurement in community-dwelling children aged 3-17?
Does at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring provide reliable blood pressure classification compared to clinic measurement in community-dwelling children aged 3-17?
At-home blood pressure monitoring by caregivers is feasible and shows high concordance with clinic measurements for children in the normal BP range, though reliability is lower for those with above-normal BP.
Supports feasibility of caregiver-led pediatric BP monitoring; leaves open age-specific reliability and validation needs.
Background As hypertension becomes more prevalent, remote assessment of blood pressure (BP) has been proposed as a method to improve BP management in the pediatric population. We investigated the reliability of at-home BP monitoring in children ages 3–17. Methods This study was conducted at six sites across the United States. Children participated in three BP measurements on one occasion by caregivers at home and, on another separate occasion, by trained examiners in a clinic setting. The results were averaged and classified according to the 2017 Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines as normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension. We collapsed participants with elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 hypertension into one group: above-normal. We examined the agreement between the caregivers’ and examiners’ BP readings and the ease of the measurement process. Results One hundred eighteen (118) children participated in this study (48.3% male; mean age 9.65 ± 4.52 years). Most caregivers (78%−93%) and examiners (88%−99%) rated elements of BP measurement as “easy” or “very easy”. Caregiver and examiners’ agreement on BP classification as normal or above-normal ranged from 75.00% to 90.16% across age groups. Caregiver and examiner BP concordance significantly differed by age group ( p = .03) and was lower among children with above-normal BPs. Conclusions Overall, most aspects of the remote BP measurement process were rated as easy, suggesting that remote monitoring of BP in children is feasible. Concordance of BP measurements by caregivers and examiners was high for children in the normal BP range. More research is needed on the reliability of home BP monitoring across the pediatric age range for those with above-normal BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: