The paper shows how to adopt Rohling's order statistics CFAR algorithm, developed for a Rayleigh background, to the case of a Weibull background with a known shape parameter. When the shape parameter is unknown, Weber and Haykin have proposed a two-parameter algorithm in which the threshold is obtained from two ranked background samples. In the paper the CFAR loss of the Weber-Haykin CFAR algorithm is analysed and compared with another CFAR processor for Weibull clutter suggested by Hansen. It is found that, with the optimal choice of representative ranks, the Weber-Haykin CFAR processor yields a smaller, but still very excessive, detection loss. Finally it is shown that CFAR is maintained when more than two ranked samples are used in setting the threshold, but without improvement in performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levanon et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: