Key result
Adding low etCO2/O2 to positive D-dimer is linked to ~12 percentage points higher PE probability.
Why the study?
Pulmonary embolism decreases the exhaled end-tidal ratio of carbon dioxide to oxygen (etCO2/O2). It was unknown whether etCO2/O2 could produce clinically important changes in the probability of segmental or larger PE on MDCTPA in moderate-risk patients with a positive D-dimer.
Does the addition of exhaled etCO2/O2 to D-dimer testing improve the detection of segmental or larger pulmonary embolism in moderate-risk patients?
Observational (n=495)
Yes
Does the addition of exhaled etCO2/O2 to D-dimer testing improve the detection of segmental or larger pulmonary embolism in moderate-risk patients?
In moderate-risk patients with a positive D-dimer, an etCO2/O2 ratio >0.45 predicts the absence of segmental or larger PE, potentially reducing the need for MDCTPA.
Negative etCO2/O2 with positive D-dimer was associated with zero segmental PE; leaves open its diagnostic utility pending prospective validation.
Rationale Pulmonary embolism (PE) decreases the exhaled end-tidal ratio of carbon dioxide to oxygen (etCO2/O2). Objectives To test if the etCO2/O2 can produce clinically important changes in the probability of segmental or larger PE on computerized tomography multidetector-row pulmonary angiography (MDCTPA) in a moderate-risk population with a positive D-dimer. Methods Emergency department and hospitalized patients with one or more predefined symptoms or signs, one or more risk factors for PE, and 64-slice MDCTPA enrolled from four hospitals. D-dimer greater than 499 ng/ml was test(+), and D-dimer less than 500 ng/ml was test(−). The median etCO2/O2 less than 0.28 from seven or more breaths was test(+) and etCO2/O2 greater than 0.45 was test(−). MDCTPA images were read by two independent radiologists and the criterion standard was the interpretation of acute PE by either reader. PE size was then graded. Measurements and Main Results We enrolled 495 patients, including 60 (12%) with segmental or larger, and 29 (6%) with subsegmental PE. A total of 367 (74%) patients were D-dimer(+), including all 60 with segmental or larger PE (posterior probability 16%). The combination of D-dimer(+) and etCO2/O2(+) increased the posterior probability of segmental or larger PE to 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference of 12%, 3.0–22%). The combination of D-dimer(+) and etCO2/O2(−) was observed in 40 patients (8%; 95% CI, 6–11%), and none (0/40; 95% CI, 0–9%) had segmental or larger PE on MDCTPA. No strategy changed the prevalence of subsegmental PE. Conclusions In moderate-risk patients with a positive D-dimer, the et etCO2/O2 less than 0.28 significantly increases the probability of segmental or larger PE and the etCO2/O2 greater than 0.45 predicts the absence of segmental or larger PE on MDCTPA. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00368836).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kline et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Segmental or larger pulmonary embolism (n=495). Exhaled end-tidal CO2/O2 ratio (etCO2/O2) combined with D-dimer vs. D-dimer alone (with MDCTPA as criterion standard) was evaluated on Posterior probability of segmental or larger pulmonary embolism on 64-slice MDCTPA (Difference 12%, 95% CI 3.0-22%). Combining positive D-dimer with etCO2/O2 <0.28 raised the probability of segmental or larger PE from 16% to 28% (difference 12%; 95% CI 3.0-22%), while etCO2/O2 >0.45 had 0% PE (0/40).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: