Randomized trial explores spectral endomorphism factorization in smooth rational surfaces, indicating implications for geometrical structures.
Let X be a smooth rational surface obtained by resolving the generically reduced quadratic-root correspondence attached to a controlled codimension-three weak Lefschetz failure. The preceding Pfaffian analysis produces a pulled-back rank-two quotient bundle Q, a nowhere-zero section q∈ H⁰(X,²Q⊗X(M)), a finite flat root double cover p:→ X, and a rank-two quotient 0X(-M)²Q G0 with 4c₂(G)-c₁(G)²=3. We study the first remaining correspondence degree e=H· M=2. Writing Λ=_(2ξ), we prove the spectral realization G p_*Λ and an exact sequence 0 p_*_ G p_*Θ0, Θ=Λ⊗2⊗ p^*( G)⁻¹.$ Every non-scalar endomorphism is then represented by an explicit spectral factorization. A nilpotent endomorphism yields a square factorization indexed by a divisor class $T$ and forces the half-branch class to be effective. A semisimple endomorphism splits $G$ and yields two orthogonal quotient binary quadratics whose dual discriminants factor the branch section. For $e=2$, the nef kernel class is orthogonal to the half-branch class. On an integral root cover this excludes the nilpotent branch. In the split branch, the quotient of smaller plane degree descends to a fixed ternary symmetric tensor. Rank three contradicts the exceptional twisting, rank two forces a double-line component of the branch divisor, and rank one has identically zero discriminant. Consequently, if the connected root double cover is normal, then G is simple. Riemann--Roch gives χ( G)=1, while a degree-window argument gives ²(G,G)=0 for $e=2$; hence G is exceptional. Normality is retained as a hypothesis. We do not classify nonnormal degree-two correspondences, treat degrees e≥3, exclude the entire quadratic-apolar stratum, or prove the weak Lefschetz property in full codimension three.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueoka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: