Examines tibial cortex transverse transport's effect on wound healing in diabetic rats, suggesting immunomodulatory benefits.
Aims To clarify the immunomodulatory mechanisms by which tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) accelerates wound healing in a type 2 diabetic rat model, with particular focus on the dynamics of subsets of monocytes and macrophages. Methods A total of 186 male Sprague-Dawley rats were induced as diabetic via a high-fat diet and streptozotocin. A full-thickness skin defect was created on the dorsum of the foot immediately following standard TTT surgery. Wound closure was monitored photographically. At defined timepoints (days 3 to 21), wound tissues underwent histological and immunofluorescence staining (haematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome, picrosirius red, CD68/iNOS/mannose) to assess re-epithelialization, collagen organization, and M1/M2 macrophage populations. Flow cytometry of bone marrow and peripheral blood (CD43 and CD172a markers) quantified classical and non-classical monocyte subsets. Monocyte/macrophage involvement was probed by depleting these cells with clodronate liposomes versus phosphate-buffered saline liposomes. Results TTT-treated rats achieved complete wound closure by day 21, markedly faster than fixator or sham controls. Histology revealed enhanced re-epithelialization, a thicker epidermis, well-organized type III collagen, and normalized collagen fibre directionality. Immunofluorescence demonstrated a rapid decline in proinflammatory M1 and an increase in reparative M2 macrophages from day 5 onward. Flow cytometry showed a pronounced surge of non-classical monocytes in bone marrow on day 3, followed by elevated circulating levels on days 3 to 6. Monocyte/macrophage depletion markedly delayed healing and disrupted collagen deposition. Conclusion TTT is associated with accelerated diabetic wound repair, accompanied by preferential mobilization of non-classical monocytes and increased M2 macrophage polarization at the wound site. These findings are consistent with a mechanically induced immunomodulatory process that may contribute to improved healing outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(8):937–950.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: