This communication is a critique of the above paper1 by Hart and Manno. The interpretation of their calculated Poynting vector as energy flux is disputed. ITe conclusion presented in their paper, based upon a comparison of their calculated Poynting vector induced by transmission line fields to microwave exposure standards, is examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seto et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: