Why the study?
Does fluid administration increase stroke volume in healthy, non-fasting, supine subjects?
Does fluid administration increase stroke volume in healthy, non-fasting, supine subjects?
In healthy, non-fasting, supine subjects, fluid administration does not increase stroke volume, suggesting they are already at the upper flat part of the Frank-Starling curve and thus normovolemic.
Fluid responsiveness testing may be unreliable in healthy supine subjects; leaves open precise mapping of Frank-Starling dynamics in normovolemia.
BACKGROUND: Both hypovolemia and a fluid overload are detrimental for outcome in surgical patients but the effort to establish normovolemia is hampered by the lack of an operational clinical definition. Manipulating the central blood volume on a tilt table demonstrates that the flat part of the Frank-Starling curve is reached when subjects are supine and that finding may be applicable for a clinical definition of normovolemia. However, it is unknown whether stroke volume (SV) responds to an increase in preload induced by fluid administration. METHODS: In 20 healthy subjects (23 +/- 2 years, mean +/- SD), SV was measured by esophageal Doppler before and after fluid administration to evaluate whether SV increases in healthy, non-fasting, supine subjects. Two hundred millilitres of a synthetic colloid (hydroxyethyl starch, HES 130/0.4) was provided and repeated if a >or=10% increment in SV was obtained. RESULTS: None of the subjects increased SV >or=10% following fluid administration but there was a minor increase in mean arterial pressure (92 +/- 15 to 93 +/- 12 mmHg, P = 0.01), while heart rate (HR) (66 +/- 12 beats min(-1); P = 0.32), cardiac output (4.8 +/- 1.1 l min(-1); P = 0.25) and the length of the systole corrected to a HR of 60 beats/min (corrected flow time; 344 +/- 24 ms; P = 0.31) did not change. CONCLUSION: Supporting the proposed definition of normovolemia, non-fasting, supine, healthy subjects are provided with a preload to the heart that does not limit SV suggesting that the upper flat part of the Frank-Starling relationship is reached.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bundgaard‐Nielsen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: