Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The compromise between reaching pulp target brightness and guaranteeing a high-quality bleached pulp is often difficult to manage because of the nature of the last chromophores present. This study reports the performance of either hydrogen peroxide or chlorine dioxide in a final bleaching stage applied to three eucalypt D0EOPD1 kraft pulps to reach a target ISO brightness of 90±0.5%. The D1 pulps had ISO brightness values of 84.7%, 86.9%, and 88.7% (pulps A, B, and C, respectively). The experimental results revealed that while chlorine dioxide charge was linearly correlated with D1 brightness, a much higher hydrogen peroxide charge was needed to bleach pulp A compared with pulps B and C. All P pulps had lower brightness reversion and better beatability than D2 pulps. In addition, we observed better physical and optical papermaking properties in P pulps (except for tear index for pulp A), although these pulps exhibited lower intrinsic viscosity. Therefore, the best choice for completing that particular ECF sequence is to push chlorine-dioxide bleaching action in D1 until at least 87% ISO brightness is reached, with the purpose of degrading phenolic units as much as possible, and then to advance with peroxide to boost brightness at the cost of quinone destruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carvalho et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: