Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reactions between the bromo(alkylidyne)tungsten complex [W(CR) Br(CO)4](R = C6H4Me-4) and the salts Na2[7,8-C2B9H9R′2](R′= Me or H), followed by treatment with [N(PPh3)2]Cl afford the compounds [N(PPh3)2][W(CR)(CO)2(η5-C2B9H9R′2)](1a, R′= Me; 1b, R′= H). The salt [NEt4][W(CMe)(CO)2(η5-C2B9H9Me2)](1c) was prepared from [W(CMe)Br(CO)4] and Tl2[7,8-C2B9H9Me2], with subsequent addition of [NEt4]Cl. Treatment of (1a) or (1b) with [AuCl(PPh3)], in the presence of TIPF6 yields the gold–tungsten complexes [AuW(µ-CR)(CO)2( PPh3)(η5-C2B9H9R′2)](2a, R′= Me; 2b, R′= H). Similarly, (1c) with [AuCl( PPh3)] affords [AuW(µ-CMe)(CO)2( PPh3)(η5-C2B9H9Me2)](2c). The structure of (2a) has been established by X-ray diffraction. The Au–W bond [2.780(8)Å] is asymmetrically bridged by the CC6H4Me-4 group [µ-C–Au 2.19(3), µ-C–W 1.88(3)Å]. Treatment of [AuCl(tht)](tht = tetrahydrothiophene) with (1a) gives the salt [N( PPh3)2][AuW2(µ-CR)2(CO)4(η5-C2B9H9Me2)2](3). The rhodium–tungsten compound [RhW(µ-CR)(CO)2(PPh3)2(η5-C2B9H9Me2)](4a) has been prepared by two routes: from the reaction between (1a) and [RhCl(PPh3)3] or from (1a) and [Rh(PPh3)2(cod)][PF6](cod = cyclo-octa-1,5-diene). The latter with (1b) yields [RhW(µ-CR)(CO)2(PPh3)2(η5-C2B9H11)](4b). Compounds (1a) and (1b) react with [Rh(PPh3)2(nbd)][PF6][nbd = norbornadiene (bicyclo[2.2.1] hepta-2,5-diene)] to give the complexes [RhW(µ-CR(CO)2(PPh3)2{η5-C2B9(C7H9)H8R′2}][5a,R′= Me; 5b, (two isomers), R′= H]. The structures of (4a) and (5a) have been established by X-ray diffraction. Both molecules have Y-shaped WRhP2 cores with the Rh–W bonds [4a, 2.681 (l), 5a, 2.662(2)Å] bridged by CC6H4Me-4 groups [4a, µ-C–Rh 2.068(5), µ-C–W 1.880(6); 5a, µ-C-Rh 2.12(2), µ-C–W 1.84(2)Å], and semibridged by a CO ligand [W–C-O, 4a, 160.2(5); 5a, 156( 1 )°] In (4a), the tungsten atom is ligated by a terminal CO group and the η5-C2B9H9Me2 cage. In (5a), the tungsten also carries a terminal CO group but the carbaborane ligand has a C7H9[nortricyclene (tricyclo[2.2.1.02,6] heptane)] fragment attached to the unique boron atom in the open face of the cage. Thus in the formation of (5a) an unprecedented hydroboration reaction has occurred, a cage B–H bond having added to the norbornadiene ligand with concomitant C–C bond formation. In contrast, treatment of the norbornadiene-containing salt (Rh(dppe)(nbd)[PF6](dppe = Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2) with (1a) gives [RhW(µ-CR)(CO)2(dppe)(η5-C2B9H9Me2)](4c). Reactions of (4a) with PEt3, PMe2Ph, dppe, and CO are reported. Examination of the 13C-{1H} and 31P-{1H} n.m.r. spectra of the complexes (4) and (5) reveal that they undergo dynamic behaviour in solution and possible mechanisms are described and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: