Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Similarities between Proterozoic (~ 1.8-2.5 Gyr) and Archean (> 2.5 Gyr) banded iron-formations are probably more significant than their differences. The contrasts largely reflect differences in the tectonic settings of Proterozoic and Archean terrains. Archean banded iron-formations are not as thick nor laterally as extensive as the major Proterozoic iron-formations. Nevertheless, some Archean iron-formations have strike lengths of over 150-200 km and may have been quite extensive prior to the deformation that has affected most Archean terrains. Stratigraphic sequences in which iron-formations occur are highly variable and indicate that iron-formations formed in many depositional environments. Sedimentary textures in the iron-formations are dominated either by granules and oolites or laminations (including microbanding) reflecting differences in their physical conditions of deposition. Granular and oolitic textures are abundant in only three Proterozoic depositional basins and most Precambrian iron-formations are laminated. Despite differences in associated lithologies and sedimentary textures Precambrian iron-formations have similar bulk compositions and mineral assemblages, implying that the chemical conditions of iron-formation deposition were similar through much of the Precambrian. The formation of banded iron-formation appears not to have reached a maximum around 1.8-2.0 Gyr but to have been an important process over a long period in the Precambrian.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gole et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: