Why the study?
Although high systolic blood pressure and low diastolic blood pressure are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CAD, their impact in patients with acute myocardial infarction remains unclear.
Does pre-procedural high systolic and low diastolic blood pressure increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in AMI patients undergoing PCI?
Does pre-procedural high systolic and low diastolic blood pressure increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in AMI patients undergoing PCI?
Pre-procedural high systolic and low diastolic blood pressure is an independent predictor of one-year adverse cardiovascular outcomes in AMI patients undergoing PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pre-procedural wide pulse pressure identifies higher-risk AMI patients; leaves open whether BP pattern modification improves outcomes.
Background Although high systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease, their impact on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Methods This multicenter prospective study included 874 AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with pre-procedural blood pressure recorded. Patients with cardiogenic shock and missing blood pressure data were excluded. The patients were categorized based on SBP (high ≥120 mmHg, low <120 mmHg) and DBP (high ≥70, low <70 mmHg) into four groups: high SBP and high DBP (HSHD), high SBP and low DBP (HSLD), low SBP and high DBP (LSHD), and low SBP and low DBP (LSLD) group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. Results The average age of the patients was 68.9 years, with a mean pulse pressure of 58 ± 19 mmHg. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in the primary endpoints among the four groups (Log-rank test, p <0.001). At 12 months, the primary endpoint occurrence was highest in the HSLD group (13.3%) and lowest in the LSHD group (2.4%). Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the HSLD group, compared to the HSHD group, was independently correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.11; p = 0.019). Conclusion Pre-procedural HSLD serves as an independent predictor and is associated with one-year adverse cardiovascular outcomes in AMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muangsillapasart et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: