Key result
General anesthesia for cesarean section remains essential for specific emergencies despite declining overall use, requiring anesthesiologists to maintain skills in rapid-sequence induction and airway management.
Why the study?
General anesthesia is sometimes inevitable for cesarean section, and practices are evolving with new drugs and equipment, requiring updated knowledge and training.
This review provides an update on modern general anesthesia techniques for cesarean sections to ensure maternal and fetal safety amidst declining training opportunities.
Requires sustained training in rapid-sequence induction for cesarean emergencies; leaves open optimal skill-maintenance strategies amid declining use.
Korea has a higher rate of cesarean sections under general anesthesia than in other countries. Neuraxial anesthesia is the gold standard for a cesarean section, but there are some cases in which general anesthesia is inevitable. Therefore, obstetric anesthesiologists should be familiar in performing general anesthesia for cesarean section. Rapid-sequence induction and intubation with cricoid pressure using thiopental-succinylcholine have been the standard for cesarean section under general anesthesia for a long time. Recently, with the introduction of new drugs (propofol, rocuronium, and sugammadex) and equipments (videolaryngoscopy and supraglottic airways), anesthesia methods have also gradually changed. Pursuing the safety of obstetric patients and anesthesiologists at the same time, this review will help update the knowledge or training in performing general anesthesia for cesarean section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung Uk Choi (2022) conducted a review in Cesarean section. General anesthesia vs. Neuraxial anesthesia was evaluated. General anesthesia for cesarean section remains essential for specific emergencies despite declining overall use, requiring anesthesiologists to maintain skills in rapid-sequence induction and airway management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: